Older microsoft word art rainbow effect1/23/2024 ![]() Lawrence’s ideas, like his style, have always been easy to mock. Reading the piece, I remembered what Lawrence had meant to me when I was young, when the real groundwork was being laid for the situation in which we find ourselves today-laid not by Lawrence, I submit, but by people such as Ann Landers, Betty Dodson (“Guru of Self-Pleasure for Generations of Women”), and the second-wave feminist Kate Millett, whose 1970 polemic, Sexual Politics, consigned Lawrence to the special circle of hell reserved for male authors who presume to tell us what women want. ![]() The piece hammered away at the book’s embarrassing shortcomings, skewered its soft targets, excoriated Lawrence generally, and laid at his door responsibility for all of the pornography we have been subjected to since, finally liberated, with his unexpurgated novel, “from dingy shops in seedy quarters.” Lawrence’s Lady Chatterley’s Loverand the British court decision that opened the way to its publication. ![]() The Catholic way is to include, and then sift: wise words from a wise priest that I remembered a few years back when I was reading, in this journal, an article withering in its condemnation of D. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply.AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |